We are of the considered opinion that the High Court committed a serious error in Respondent-appreciating the evidence led by the parties before the arbitrator. This evidence was duly scrutinized and evaluated by the arbitrator. With regard to claim No.5, the arbitrator has given elaborate reasons.
(TARUN CHATTERJEE & SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.)
M/S. RAVINDRA KUMAR GUPTA & COMPANY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Civil Appeal No. 8019 of 2009 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3755 of 2008)-Decided on 3-2-2009
No comments:
Post a Comment