Friday, April 1, 2011

udpatesj


Affidavit - Notary before whom sworn not examined - Not a proof in accordance with law - No reliance can be placed thereon. 2010(1) Civil Court Cases 688 (S.C.)

Arbitration agreement - Need not to be stamped. 2010(1) Apex Court Judgments 072 (S.C.)

Arbitration clause in Will - Not an arbitration agreement. 2010(1) Apex Court Judgments 403 (S.C.)

Arbitrator - `All disputes' - Does not mean it is one time measure - It cannot be held that arbitration clause if invoked once the remedy of arbitration is no longer available in regard to other disputes that might arise in future. 2010(1) Apex Court Judgments 656 (S.C.)
Attorney - When can depose - In an eviction petition on ground of bonafide necessity and in a suit for specific performance, it is the party concerned, who when enters witness box can prove its case - Exceptions to this requirement are where all the affairs of a party are completely managed, transacted and looked after by an attorney (who may happen to be a close family member), it may be possible to accept the evidence of such attorney even with reference to `bona fides' or 'readiness and willingness'. 2010(4) Civil Court Cases 792 (S.C.)
Condonation - Filing of an application for condonation under a wrong provision of law does not vitiate the application. 2010(3) Apex Court Judgments 671 (S.C.)
Condonation of delay - Delay is just one of the ingredients which has to be considered - Court must also take into consideration the conduct of the parties, bona fide reasons for condonation of delay and whether such delay could easily be avoided by the applicant acting with normal care and caution. 2010(3) Apex Court Judgments 509 (S.C.)
Condonation of delay - Separate application for condonation of delay is not required when all the ingredients of the application for condonation of delay are mentioned in the application U.O.9.R.13 CPC to set aside the exparte decree.2010(3) Apex Court Judgments 107 (S.C.) : 2010(4) Civil Court Cases 120 (S.C.)
Delay - Condonation - Court must also take into consideration the conduct of the parties, bona fide reasons for condonation of delay and whether such delay could easily be avoided by the applicant acting with normal care and caution. 2010(4) Civil Court Cases 551 (S.C.)
Delay - Condonation - Sufficient and good grounds - No straight jacket formula - Each case has to be weighed from its facts and the circumstances in which the party acts and behaves. 2010(3) Civil Court Cases 374 (S.C.)
Delay - Condonation - There is no straight jacket formula to come to the conclusion of sufficient and good grounds. 2010(2) Apex Court Judgments 475 (S.C.)
Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued to discharge liability of another person - Person issuing the cheque is liable u/s 138 of the Act and not the person whose liability was discharged. 2010(4) Criminal Court Cases 314 (S.C.)
Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued to discharge the liability of another person - Cheque dishonoured - Person issuing the cheque is liable u/s 138 of the Act and not the person whose liability was discharged. 2010(3) Apex Court Judgments 026 (S.C.)
Dishonour of cheque - Cheque issued to discharge the liability of another person - Person issuing the cheque is liable.2010(4) Civil Court Cases 208 (S.C.)
Dishonour of cheque - Compounding - Now to be allowed with graded scheme - At the first or second hearing in trial Court without any costs - At a later stage it may be allowed with 10% costs - In Sessions Court or High Court with 15% and in Supreme Court with 20% - Amount to be deposited with Legal Services Authority - Amount of costs can be reduced in view of specific facts and circumstances of the case while recording reasons in writing for such variance. 2010(2) Apex Court Judgments 110 (S.C.) : 2010(2) Civil Court Cases 593 (S.C.) : 2010(2) Criminal Court Cases 326 (S.C.)
Dishonour of cheque - Compounding of offence at appellate stage permissible. 2010(1) Criminal Court Cases 267 (S.C.)