Monday, January 30, 2012

Watch how and when you eat
Yoga and ayurveda teacher Amrit Raj gives advice on how and when you must eat your food.In general,eat your food with relish for best results,he says


First and foremost,eat to live,but dont live to eat.Second,eat food that is beneficial and last,eat in moderate quantities.There are several dos and donts formulated about food by ancient sages that are useful to abide by.For instance,never eat your food in ahurry or when you are in a disturbed state of mind.Eat when you have regained your peace of mind when you are calm.
Always wash your hands before sitting down to eat.Take your meal in a clean,well-ventilated and welllighted dining area.There are also rules for how much you should eat as well.Fill half your stomach with solids,a quarter of your stomach with water and liquids and keep a quarter empty for air and the digestive process.
Ayogi or committed yoga practitioner takes only one full meal a day.He begins his day with a light breakfast,and this is the best formula for living a healthy and hearty life.A person who eats two full meals a day might live mostly to eat and will suffer from illnesses from time to time.
Aperson who greedily eats more than twice will definitely be ill,and in yoga and ayurveda,he will be called a r o g e eor a sick person.Such a person is gluttonous and always ill.
You should also watch how you eat it shouldnt be either too fast or too slow.Eating slowly leads to excessive consumption and eating fast is not good for the digestive process.
There are other guidelines too.Dont do yoga and other exercises immediately after taking food.It is better,therefore,to do yogic exercises early in the morning or in the evening when the stomach is empty.After you have finished your exercises,take food after one hour.Dont go to bed immediately after your supper either.Wait for an hour after food before you retire to bed.
Source:http://ping.fm/Fbu9B
Court slaps Rs.20,000 fine a "chronic litigant" for unabatedly abusing the process of law
New Delhi, Jan 29 (IANS) Abusing the process of law by questioning investigating agencies and maligning the judiciary has cost a non-resident Indian (NRI) Rs.20,000.

The Delhi High Court order came on a plea of NRI N.S. Hoon seeking compensation of Rs.5,000 crore from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for allegedly implicating him in a criminal case.

He sought action against the erring officials of CBI for harassing him for 25 years.

Justice M.L. Mehta said: "In the present petition, not only the CBI and police are questioned but even the judiciary and the government are sought to be maligned in a highly derogatory and utterly contemptuous manner. The unparliamentary language used by the petitioner is evident by words like 'slave magistrate', 'obliging judge', 'corrupt CBI'."

The court said that such petitions were nothing but a waste of precious judicial time and mockery of the legal process.

"The conduct of the petitioner is highly condemnable and deserves no consideration even due to his age as he has unabatedly abused the process of law in intimidating and obstructing public officials from discharging their duties," the court said.

Hoon, who had acquired British citizenship, had argued that the officers of CBI acted against him at the instance of some influential people and they should be prosecuted under law.

He claimed to have undergone mental agony and physical suffering in the past 25 years and sought financial compensation.

"I was arrested on May 14, 1987 despite an anticipatory bail order from the Delhi High Court. They seized my passport for such a long time causing huge losses to my business abroad," Hoon said.

He added even the trial court had acquitted him from all the charges under the Foreigners Act.

According to the CBI, Hoon concealed his identity as a British citizen during his stay in two different hotels, in 1986-87, which was a criminal offence.

The CBI alleged that during his stay in Delhi's Ambassador Hotel, the petitioner paid the hotel tariff in rupees whereas he should have paid in British pounds.

Similarly, he stayed at an hotel in Jaipur and paid Rs.8,000 in Indian currency.

Justice Mehta called the petitioner a "chronic litigant" who filed cases against the authorities whenever any step was taken against him due to his activities which were contrary to law.

Source:http://ping.fm/SFnSV

Friday, January 27, 2012