Wednesday, June 22, 2011

LL.M. SYLLABUS _ Kurukshertra University_2010-11


LL.M. SYLLABUS _ Kurukshertra University_2010-11

LL.M. SYLLABUS _ Kurukshertra University_2010-11

Previous: 
There shall be six theory papers of 100 marks each and of 3 hours duration. Papers 1 to 4 are compulsory theory papers. For paper 5 & 6, the students may offer paper 1 & 2 from the optional Group-C 'Business Law.

COMPULSORY PAPERS:
I.       Law, Social Transformation and Judicial Process in India (101)
II.      Indian Constitutional Law and the New Challenges (102)
III.      Principles of Statutory Interpretation. (103)
IV.     Legal Theory (104)

OPTIONAL PAPERS

Paper V & VI: Group (C) Business Law
I.       Corporate Law and Management (105)
II.      Law of Contractual Transactions (106)

101 DE – Paper I: Law, Social Transformation and Judicial Process in India
Maximum Marks: 100
Time: 3 (Three) hours
Note:
1.                Eight questions shall be set with two questions from each unit. The candidates shall be required to attempt four questions in all selecting one question from each Unit.
2.                  All questions shall carry equal marks.

Unit – I           Principle of Legislation
1.                  Principles of Utility
2.                  Principles of Civil Code
3.                  Principles of Penal Code
4.                  Constitutional Utilitarianism, Modern Trends
Unit – II          Legislative Process in India
1.                  Legislative Procedure, ordinary and money bills joint session, Assent to bills
2.                  Procedure in the House, Committees o the House, need for reforms.
3.             Delegated Legislation – Need for delegated Legislation, classification of delegated legislation, Constitutionality of delegated legislation, and control mechanism of administrative rule making   in India.
4.                  Failure of the executive / Administration to enforce the law, Civil disobedience of law.
Unit – III        
1.                  Law and Social Transformation - Law as an instrument of social change - Law as the product of traditions and culture.
2.                  Responses of law to social institutions
a.      Religion and Law
b.      Language and Law
c.      Community and Law
3.                  Women and Law
4.                  Children and Law
5.                  Modernization trends in different areas
a.      Family Law
b.      Local Self Government
c.      Court Processes – Civil Law and Criminal Law
Unit – IV        Judicial Process
1.                  Judicial Legislation as an instrument of social ordering.
2.       Power of Judicial Review under the constitution of India, Judicial activism, Dworking’s Theory of Adjudication.
3.     Concept of Justice, Relation between law and justice, Equivalence theories, Independence of Justice theories.

102 DE – Paper – II: Indian Constitutional Law and the New Challenges
Maximum Marks: 100
Time: 3 (Three) hours
Note:
1.                  Eight questions shall be set with two questions from each unit. The candidates shall be required to attempt four questions in all selecting one question from each Unit.
2.                  All questions shall carry equal marks.
Unit – I
1.                    The Executive – Union and States
1.1             Parliamentary / Presidential form Governments – Suitability.
1.2             President / Governor and Council of Ministers – Relationship.
1.3             Coalition government, Power Politics.
2.                    Parliamentary and State Legislatures
2.1             Composition of Legislature, Elections, Corrupt Practices
2.2             Role of the Legislature, Elections, Corrupt Practices.
3.                    Judiciary in India
3.1             Independence of Judiciary, Appointment, Removal of the Judges, Code of Conduct for Judges,
3.2             Power of Judicial Review, Writ Jurisdiction and other Powers of the court, Judicial Activism,
3.3             Separation of Powers, Relationship of Executive, Legislature and Courts.
Unit – II
1.                  Fundamental Rights, Definitions of State and Law.
2.                  Right to Equality, Reverse discrimination.
3.                  Political Freedom of the citizen reasonableness of restrictions.
4.              Right to life and personal liberty, various dimensions of the right to life and personal liberty.
Unit – III
1.                  Secularism, right of the minorities.
2.                  Socio-economic rights, Directive principles of state policy-enforcement by the state relationship between directive principles and fundamental rights.
3.                  Doctrine of eminent domain, right to property.
4.                  Parliamentary, privileges and fundamental rights.
5.                  Fundamental duties of the citizen.
Unit – IV
1.                  Federalism, Co-operative federalism.
2.                  Legislative and Administrative relations.
3.                  Distribution of financial resources, Inter-State trade and commerce.
4.                  Amendment of the Constitution, Basic structure theory.

103 DE – Paper III: Principles of Statutory Interpretation
Maximum Marks: 100
Time: 3 (Three) hours
Note:
1.                  Eight questions shall be set with two questions from each unit. The candidates shall be required to attempt four questions in all selecting one question from each Unit.
2.                  All questions shall carry equal marks

Unit – I
1.                  Basic Principles of Interpretation: Meaning of Interpretation,  Interpretation and Construction, Intention of Legislature, Statute must be read as a whole in its context, Presumption in favour of constitutionality of a statue, If meaning plain, effect must be given to it irrespective of consequences.
2.                  Rules of Literal Construction.
3.                  Golden Rule of Construction.
4.                  Mischief Rule of Construction.

Unit – II
1.                  Internal Aids to Construction: Short title, Long title, Preamble, Headings, Marginal Notes, Punctuation, Illustrations Interpretations Clause, Proviso, Explanation, Schedules.
2.                  Maxims:          (I) Ejusdem Generis  (II) Expressio Unius Est Exclusion Alterius  (III) Nocituar A sociis
3.                  Interpretation of Constitution.

Unit - III
1.                  External Aids to Construction, Parliamentary Historical Facts and Surrounding Circumstances, Dictionaries, Tex-books, Use of Foreign Decisions, Statutes in Pari-materia.
2.                  Codifying and Consolidation Statutes,
3.                  Mandatory and Directory Provisions.
4.                  Commencement and Repeal of Statutes.

Unit - IV
1.                  Beneficial and Liberal Construction.
2.                  Construction of Remedial and Penal Statutes.
3.                  Construction of Taxing Statutes.
4.                  Presumption as to Jurisdiction of the Courts.
5.                  Construction to Prevent, Evasion and Abuse.

104 DE – Paper – IV: Legal Theory
Maximum Marks: 100
Time: 3 (Three) hours
Note:
1.                  Eight questions shall be set with two questions from each unit. The candidates shall be required to attempt four questions in all selecting one question from each Unit.
2.                  All questions shall carry equal marks

Unit - I
1.                  Nature, Value and Province of Jurisprudence.
2.                  Positivism:    
            (a)       Bentham and Positivism
            (b)       John Austin and Analytical Jurisprudence
3.                  Modern Positivism:  
(a)               Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law
(b)               Hart’s Concept of Law
(c)               Dworkin’s Criticism of Positivism and his theory of Law 
Unit- II
1.      Historical Jurisprudence:
(a)               Savingy and the Historical School
(b)               Henry Maine and the Anthropological School
2.      Natural Law
(a)               Revival of Natural Law
(b)               Lon L. Fuller – Morality of Law
(c)               Stammler – ‘Natural Law with a variable content’
3.      The Theory of Precedent in India

Unit – III
1.                  Modern Realism.
2.                  Sociological Jurisprudence:
                    (a)  Ihering, Ehrlich  (b) Duguit Roscoe Pounds’ Social Engineering
3.                  Theory of Social Justice:
(a)         John Rawls    (b)  Indian Approach to socio – economic justice

Unit – IV        Legal Concept
1.   Legal Right.         2.  Leal Personality       3.   Possession and Ownership

105 DE – Paper – I: Corporate Law And Management
Maximum Marks: 100
Time: 3 (Three) hours
Note:
1.                  Eight questions shall be set with two questions from each unit. The candidates shall be required to attempt four questions in all selecting one question from each Unit.
2.                  All questions shall carry equal marks.

UNIT − I
·              Corporation – its past, present and future,
·              Development of various concepts relating to company law; Jurisprudence; History of company Legislation in India.
·              Concept of corporate personality and limited liability, advantages of Incorporation; Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil, Corporation and Fundamental Right.
·              Kinds of companies and other Forms of Business Organization.
·              Registration and in-corporation, powers of company, Sources of Power Memorandum of Association, Doctrine of ultra vires.
·              Promoters – position, importance, duties and liabilities.
·              Company Law Board – Its Constitution, Power and Functions.

Unit – II
·              Prospectus: Statement in lieu of   Prospectus, Liability for mis-statements.
·              Shares – Meaning and Nature, kinds, Allotment, Transfer and Transmission, Effects of irregular Allotment, Right Issues, Bonus Shares, Purchase of its own shares, Borrowing Powers of Companies – Debentures, kinds of debentures, Charges, Classification of Charges, Registration of Charges.
·              Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 – Salient Features.
·              Dividend – Meaning and Nature, power to pay dividend, mode of payments, Limitations on payments.
·              Charitable and Political Contributions by Companies.

Unit- III
·              Meetings – Meaning and Scope shareholders.
·              Democracy, Kinds of Meetings, Statutory Meeting, Annual General Meeting, Extra – Ordinary General Meeting, Procedure and conduct of meeting – Notice; quorum, Voting Resolutions and Minutes.
·              Directors – Concepts of directors and its evolution, Philosophy for the emergence of Board of Directors, position and status of directors, kinds of directors, Appointment of Directors and their retirement.
·              Directors - Qualifications, disqualifications, Powers and duties including Fiduciary obligations, Removal of Directors.
·              Managing – Director, whole – time director and Manager Appointment, Powers and Functions, Managerial Remuneration; statutory limits and restrictions.
·              Investigation and inspection – Powers of Central Government and Company Law Board.

Unit - IV
·              Control – Share-holders Control over the management, Government Control over management.
·              Majority powers and Minority Rights, oppression and mismanagement.
·              Wing up and distribution – Meaning and scope, kind of wingding up – sing up by court, Voluntary wing up, Wingding up under the Supervision of the Courts.
·              Effect of Liquidation proceedings on the company and its organs, members, creditors and workers.
·              Liquidator and official liquidator – Position, powers and duties





106 DE – Paper – II: Law of Contractual Transactions
Maximum Marks: 100
Time: 3 (Three) hours
Note:
1.               Eight questions shall be set with two questions from each unit. The candidates shall be required to attempt four questions in all selecting one question from each Unit.
2.                  All questions shall carry equal marks.

UNIT − I
·           Genesis and Philosophy of Contracts and its importance in a commercial developing society.
·           Freedom of Contract: Nature and basis of contractual obligation.
·           Formation of Contract – Agreement and Contract, Intention to create legal obligation; Requirements of valid contract.
·           Proposal and Acceptance – Essential elements, communication and revocation. Proposal and invitation for proposal, standing order, Tenders, and Auction sale.
·           Standard Forms of Contract – Exclusion clauses and their effects.
·           Unilateral and bilateral contracts.
·      Capacity to Contract – Meaning and Scope, Contractual Capacity of a minor, Corporation, Government, consequences of Minor’s Agreement and Estoppel, Ratification.
·           Contract by a person of unsound mind-Legal Effects.
·           Other Legal disabilities.
·           Free consent - Meaning and Scope: Vitiating elements- coercion, Fraud, Misrepresentation, Undue influence and Mistake, Distinction between Fraud and innocent misrepresentation, coercion and Duress, Mistake of Law and Mistake of Fact, Common, Mutual and Unilateral Mistake, Remedies available when agreement is vitiated by mistake.

UNIT−II
·           Consideration – Nudum pactum – its need, meaning and essential; Adequacy of Consideration, privity of contract and Consideration – its exceptions; past; Executed and Executory Consideration, Doctrine of Consideration and Promomissiory Estoppels; Essentiality of consideration with exceptions.
·                    Legality of objects and consideration – Unlawful consideration and objects; Void, Voidable and unlawful Agreements and their effects; Concept of immoral and Public Policy, Head against public policy.
·                    Void Agreements, Agreements in restraint of Marriage, Agreement in restraint of Trade, Agreement in restraint of Legal Proceedings, Uncertain Agreement and Wagering Agreements.
·                    Contingent Contract – Meaning and scope, Reciprocal promises.
·                    Discharge of Contract – Meaning and modes of discharge, performance and Tender – Place and Time of performance, Time as essence of contract, performance of joint promises.
·      Discharge by Agreement – Novation, Remission of performance, Accord and Satisfaction.
·                    Discharge of Impossibility of performance and Frustration-Nature and scope of the doctrine of Frustration, Specific ground of Frustration.

UNIT−III
·           Restitution;
·           Quasi-Contracts or certain Relation resembling those created by contract.
·      Breach of contract and remedies, Meaning of breach and Anticipatory breach; Damages – Meaning and Nature, Kinds, Rule in Hadly v. Baxendable –Remotences of Damage.
·        Contract of Indemnity – Definition and Nature, Distinction between indemnity and Guarantee, Rights of the Indemnity Holder.
·           Contract of Guarantee – Definition and Scope, specific and Continuing Guarantee, Creditors Right against Principal Debtor and Surety, Discharge of Surety; Surety’s Rights against the principal debtor and Co-surety, Principal of Contribution by co-surety.
UNIT−IV
·       Baliment – Definition and Essential Features, Bailment for Reward and gratuitous Baliment, Right and duties of Bailor and Bailee.
·           Finder of lost goods – Rights and Duties of Finder; Rights and Liabilites of owner.
·        Pledge – Definition, Nature and Scope, Who can pledge; Rights and duties of pawnor and pawnee.
·           Kinds of Agents – Factory, Brokers, Auctioneers, Del-Cordere agents, etc.
·           Agency – Nature, Distinction from other transaction; Contractual basis of Agency.
·           Modes of Creation of Agency – Express, implied, Ratification by operation of Law.
·         Scope of Agent’s Authority; Rights and Liabilites of the Agent as against principal and third party; Rights and Liabilites of principal and third party as against each other and as against Agent.
·         Delegation by Agent-Sub-Agent and Substituted Agent-Distinction and Legal Effects.
·           Termination of Agency, modes of termination, Agency couple with interest

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Delhi Police affidavit on section 144 cr. p. c. before Hon'ble Delhi High Court


IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 5000/2010

BANO BEE  Petitioner through Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Advs.

versus

UOI AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Ms. Snigdha Sharma and Ms. Harleen Kaur, Advs. for UOI.

Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Adv.for R-2.

CORAM:
  
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
 
O R D E R:   31.05.2011
  
1 Heard Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner,  Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General for Union of India and Mr. Najmi Waziri, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

2 By this writ petition, the petitioner as pro bono publico has  basically prayed for the following reliefs:-

(b   Issue a writ of mandamus or any other direction to the Respondents to lay down the guidelines for holding public meeting, dharna, peaceful demonstration etc. in various part of New Delhi.
(c)  Declare that imposing of blanket ban on all assemblies in Central Delhi/New Delhi area is illegal.
(d) Declare that repeated promulgation of prohibitory orders under Section 144 of Code of Criminal Procedure as illegal.

3 This Court on 2nd August, 2010 had passed the following order:-

            In this public interest litigation, the petitioner invoking the jurisdiction of  this  Court  under  Article  226  of  the  Constitution  of  India has  called  in question  the  legal  substantiality  and  tenability  of  the order  dated  6th  July, 2010  passed  by  the  Deputy  Commissioner  of Police  whereby  he  has,  in exercise  of  powers  conferred  on  him under  Section  144  of  the  Criminal Procedure  Code,  1973  (for  short the  Code’)  read  with  Notification  No. 11036/1/08-UTL  dated 31.10.2008  issued  by  the  Government  of  India, Ministry  of  Home Affairs,  New  Delhi  passed  an  order  prohibiting  certain activities.
2.       It is urged in the petition that the Delhi Police has been issuing such prohibitory  orders  from  time  to  time  as  a  result  of  which  the fundamental right to assemble peacefully under Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution which includes holding peaceful dharna, demonstration, etc. has been destroyed.  It is  contended  that  the  impugned  order  does not indicate  any  criteria  for granting  or  refusing  permission. It  is completely  left  to  the  discretion  of Delhi  Police  as  a  consequence  of which  the  permission  to  hold  dharna, public  meetings  in  the  entire prohibited  area  which  is  the  centre  of  power and best suited for political dharna is denied.

3.       It is averred that the petitioner is one of the members of ‘Bhopal Gas Pidit Mahila Stationary Karamchari Sangh’ who had come along with other activists to Delhi to raise a protest because of the failure of the Government of India to set up an empowered commission to look into the problems of the victims of toxic gases leak from the plant of Union Carbide in 1984, but the same  has  become  unfruitful  because  of  the  order passed  by  the  Deputy Commissioner of Police.  Reference has been made to Section 144 to show that  in  total  violation  of  the  said provision,  the  Delhi  Police  have  been issuing orders under Section 144, Cr.PC  in a routine manner without there being  any  emergent situation. It  is  the  case  of  the  petitioner  that  the  said orders create unreasonable restriction which affects the fundamental right of the petitioner. It is urged that the prohibitory orders are in total violation of Article 19(1)(a) and (b) and the same have been issued without any basis and thereby  tantamounts  to  abuse  of  the  process  of  the  mandate contained  in Section 144 of Cr.PC.

4.       We have heard Mr.  Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Jasbir Kaur, learned counsel for respondent No.1and Mr.N. Waziri learned counsel for respondent No.2 on the question of admission. It is submitted by Mr. Bhushan that the orders have been passed one after the other in a routine manner without the authority addressing to the  emergent  nature  and  taking  recourse  to  power conferred  on  it  under Section 144 Cr.PC which is impermissible.  It is propounded by him that the prohibitions that have been stipulated in   the order are  violative of fundamental  rights  and  the  right  to  protest  is totally  extinguished. To buttress the submission, he has placed reliance on the decision in Himmat Lal K. Shah v. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad (1973) 1 SCC 227.

5.       Ordinarily  we  would  have  dealt  with  the  law  laid  down  in Himmat Lal K. Shah  Case (supra) and another decision rendered in Babulal Parate v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors., AIR 1961 SC 884 by the Constitution Bench, but we have come across a decision in Acharya Jagdishwaran andAvadhuta v. Commissioner of Police, Calcutta and another, AIR 1984 SC 51, wherein it has been held as follows:

“.….The  other  aspect,  viz.,  the  propriety  of  repetitive prohibitory  orders  is,  however,  to  our  mind  a  serious matter and since long arguments have been advanced, we  propose  to deal  with  it.  In  this  case  as  a  fact  from  October  1979  till 1982  at  the  interval  of  almost  two  months  orders  under Section  144(1)  of  the  Code  have  been made from time to time. It is not disputed before us  that  the  power  conferred under  this  section  is  intended  for  immediate  prevention  of  breach  of  peace  or  speedy remedy.  An  order  made  under  this  section  is  to  remain valid  for  two  months  from  the  date  of its  making  as provided in sub-section (4) of Section 144. The proviso to sub-section (4) authorises the State Government in case it considers it necessary so to do for preventing danger to human  life,  health  or  safety,  or  for  preventing  a  riot  or any affray, to direct by notification that an order made by a Magistrate may remain in force for a further period not exceeding  six  months  from  the  date  on  which  the  order made by the Magistrate would have, but for such order, expired.  The  effect  of  the  proviso,  therefore,  is  that  the State   Government   would   be   entitled   to   give   the prohibitory  order  an  additional  term  of  life  but  that would  be  limited  to  six  months  beyond  the  two  months’ period  in  terms  of  sub-section  (4)  of  Section  144  of  the Code.  Several  decisions  of  different  High  Courts  have rightly  taken  the  view  that  it  is  not  legitimate  to  go  on
making   successive   orders   after   earlier   orders   have lapsed  by  efflux  of  time.  A  Full  Bench  consisting  of  the entire  Court  of  12  Judges  in  Gopi  Mohun  Mullick  v. Taramoni   Chowdhrani   examining   the   provisions   of Section  518  of  the  Code  of  1861  (corresponding  to present  Section  144)  took  the  view  that  such  an  action was   beyond   the   Magistrate’s   powers.   Making   of successive orders was disapproved by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Bishessur Chuckerbutty v. Emperor.   Similar   view   was   taken   in   Swaminatha Mudaliar v. Gopalakrishna Naidu, Taturam Sahu v. State of  Orissa,  Ram  Das  Gaur  v.  City  Magistrate,  Varanasi, and Ram Narain Sah v. Parmeshar Prasad Sah. We have no  doubt  that  the  ratio  of  these  decisions  represents  a correct  statement  of  the  legal  position.  The  proviso  to sub-section  (4)  of  Section  144  which  gives  the  State Government jurisdiction to  extend the prohibitory  order for a maximum period of six months beyond the life of the order made by the Magistrate is clearly indicative of the position  that  Parliament  never  intended  the  life  of  an order under Section 144 of the Code to remain in force beyond  two  months  when  made  by  a  Magistrate.  The scheme  of  that  section  does  not  contemplate  repetitive orders and in case the situation so warrants steps have to be  taken  under  other  provisions  of  the  law  such  as Section 107 or Section 145 of the Code when individual disputes are raised and to meet a situation such as here, there  are  provisions  to  be  found  in  the  Police  Act.  If repetitive  orders  are  made  it  would  clearly  amount  to abuse of the power conferred by Section 144 of the Code. It  is  relevant  to  advert  to  the  decision  of  this  Court  in Babulal Parate v. State of Maharashtra where the vires of  Section  144  of  the  Code  was  challenged.  Upholding the provision, this Court observed:

“Public order has to be maintained in advance in order to ensure it and, therefore, it is competent to a legislature to pass a law permitting an appropriate authority to take anticipatory   action or place anticipatory restrictions upon particular kinds of acts in an emergency for the purpose of maintaining public order....”

It was again emphasized (at p.891 of AIR):

“But it  is  difficult  to  say  that  an  anticipatory action taken by such an authority in an emergency where danger to  public order is genuinely apprehended is anything other than an action done in the discharge of the duty to maintain order....”

This  Court  had,  therefore,  appropriately  stressed  upon the feature that the provision of Section 144 of the Code was  intended  to  meet  an  emergency.  This  postulates  a situation  temporary  in  character  and,  therefore,  the duration of an order under Section 144 of the Code could never  have  been  intended  to  be  semi-permanent  in character.”

6.       In view of the aforesaid enunciation of law and keeping in view the
nature of assertions made in the writ petition, we are inclined to issue notice on the question of admission and disposal.

7.       Issue notice.

8.     As Ms. Jasbir and Mr. Waziri have entered appearance, no requisites need be filed.  Counter affidavits be filed within two weeks.  Rejoinder, if any, be filed within a week thereafter.

9.       Matter be listed on 25th August, 2010.

4 Thereafter, a counter affidavit has been filed and the matter was debated on certain occasions. Today an affidavit has been filed by the second respondent. In paragraph 1 of the affidavit, it has been stated as follows:-
1.   That continuous Prohibition under Section 144 Cr. P. C. 1973 (2 of 1974) under the jurisdiction of New Delhi District declaring certain areas as Prohibited area for holding any public meeting, dharna, peaceful protest etc. has been discontinued. The said provision of law would be invoked as and when warranted because of an emergent situation.
5 In view of the aforesaid, we are of the considered opinion that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the writ petition. However, we observe that the respondent No.2 shall always be guided by the law of the land while taking recourse to Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

6  The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

  

CHIEF JUSTICE
SANJIV KHANNA, J.

MAY 31, 2011